| Christian Walter - Law - 2006 - 712 pages
...siehe die »Verfassung« von 1 776, Poore, Federal and State Constitutions I, aaO (Anm.48), 257f. 126 »No preference shall be given by law to any Christian sect or mode of worship.«, Poore, Federal and State Constitutions I, aaO (Anm.48), 259. 127 »Section 1. It being the duty of... | |
| United States. Office of Education - Education - 1965 - 818 pages
...licentiouness, or to justify practices inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state. 11 ARTICLE II Sec. 4. No preference shall be given by law to any Christian sect or mode of worship. ARTICLE VII Sec. 1. It being the duty of all men to worship the Supreme Being, the Great Creator and... | |
| Stephen Colwell - History - 1854 - 176 pages
...licentiousness or to justify practices inconsistent with the peace and safety of the State." Sect. 4. "No preference shall be given by law to any Christian sect, or mode of worship." NEW YORK. Preamble. " We, the people of the State of New York, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom/'... | |
| Henry Louis Mencken - Periodicals - 1925 - 630 pages
...Tithes were not abolished in Vermont until 1808. The constitution of Connecticut of 1818 provided: "No preference shall be given by law to any Christian sect or mode of worship. . . . And each and every society or denominations of Christians in this State shall have and enjoy... | |
| Van der Vyver, J. D., Johan David Van der Vyver, John Witte, Jr. - Political Science - 1996 - 722 pages
...to all persons in this state. . . . Sec. 4. No preferences in Christian sects or modes of worship. No preference shall be given by law to any Christian sect or mode of worship." 66 See Miller, The First Liberty; James E. Wood, Jr., The First Freedom: Religion and the Bill of Rights... | |
| 1819 - 692 pages
...inconsistent with the peace and safety of llie state. § 4. No preference sh.ill be given by law to an/ Christian sect or mode of worship. § 5. Every citizen may freely speak, write and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being re- ' »ponsible for the abuse of that liberty. § 6.... | |
| |