 | California. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1916 - 964 pages
...that obligation exists in the nature of things, and without impairing the obligation of the contract, the remedy may certainly be modified as the wisdom of the nation may direct." In Waggoner v. Flack, 188 US 595, [47 L. Ed. 609, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 345], it was held that where the... | |
 | David P. Currie - Law - 1992 - 518 pages
...means of inducing [the debtor] to perform it," and [wjithout impairing the obligation of the contract, the remedy may certainly be modified as the wisdom of the nation shall direct."168 '"Adams v. Storey, 1 F. Cas. 141, 145-46 (CCDNY 1817) (No. 66) (praising insolvency... | |
 | Kermit L. Hall - Law - 2000 - 464 pages
...Chief Justice Marshall stated his opinion in Sturgis v. Crowninshield that "the distinction between the obligation of a contract and the remedy given...nature of things. Without impairing the obligation of the contract, the remedy may certainly be modified."84 Marshall nonetheless declared unconstitutional... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1921 - 1098 pages
...required to give such notice. Does this render the act unconstitutional ? "The distinction between the obligation of a contract, and the remedy given...nature of things. Without impairing the obligation of the contract, the remedy may certainly be modified as the wisdom of the nation shall direct." In a... | |
 | Kansas. Supreme Court, Elliot V. Banks, William Craw Webb, Asa Maxson Fitz Randolph, Gasper Christopher Clemens, Thomas Emmet Dewey, Llewellyn James Graham, Oscar Leopold Moore, Earl Hilton Hatcher, Howard Franklin McCue - Law reports, digests, etc - 1896 - 914 pages
...Opinion of the Court. And again (pp. 200, 201): " The distinction between the obligation of aeontract and the remedy given by the legislature to enforce...been taken at the bar, and exists in the nature of tilings. Without impairing the obligation of the contract, the remedy may certainly be modified as... | |
 | United States - 1819 - 652 pages
...patriots who framed our constitution, orto the people who adopted it. The distinction bet weenjthe obligation of a contract, and the remedy given by the legislature to enforce that obligation, exists 'in the nature of things. The remedy may be modified as the législative wisdom shall direct,... | |
 | H. NILES - 1819 - 658 pages
...who framed our constitution, or to the people who adopted it. The distinction between the tibKgatiun of a contract, and the remedy given by the legislature to enforce that obligation, exists in the nature of things. The remedy may be modified as the legislative wisdom stall direct,... | |
| |
The distinction between the obligation of a contract, and the remedy given by the legislature to enforce that obligation, has been taken at the bar, and exists in the nature of things. Without impairing the obligation of the contract, the remedy may certainly... 
