The Cloaking of Power: Montesquieu, Blackstone, and the Rise of Judicial Activism
How did the US judiciary become so powerful—powerful enough that state and federal judges once vied to decide a presidential election? What does this prominence mean for the law, constitutionalism, and liberal democracy? In The Cloaking of Power, Paul O. Carrese provides a provocative analysis of the intellectual sources of today’s powerful judiciary, arguing that Montesquieu, in his Spirit of the Laws, first articulated a new conception of the separation of powers and strong but subtle courts. Montesquieu instructed statesmen to “cloak power” by placing judges at the center of politics, while concealing them behind juries and subtle reforms. Tracing this conception through Blackstone, Hamilton, and Tocqueville, Carrese shows how it led to the prominence of judges, courts, and lawyers in America today. But he places the blame for contemporary judicial activism squarely at the feet of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. and his jurisprudential revolution, which he believes to be the source of the now-prevalent view that judging is merely political.
To address this crisis, Carrese argues for a rediscovery of an independent judiciary—one that blends prudence and natural law with common law and that observes the moderate jurisprudence of Montesquieu and Blackstone, balancing abstract principles with realistic views of human nature and institutions. He also advocates for a return to the complex constitutionalism of the American founders and Tocqueville and for judges who understand their responsibility to elevate citizens above individualism, instructing them in law and right.
Other editions - View all
The Cloaking of Power: Montesquieu, Blackstone, and the Rise of Judicial ...
Paul O. Carrese
No preview available - 2013
according achieve American analysis ancient argues argument authority balance Blackstone Blackstone’s century chapter character cites classic Coke Commentaries common law complex conception concern constitutional constitutionalism courts criminal criticism deﬁned Democracy despotism developed discussion distinct elements emphasis England English equity especially essay evident examination executive extreme Federalist ﬁnds ﬁrst French fundamental further given Gothic Hamilton historical Hobbes Holmes human ideas important independent individual inﬂuence institutions interpretation judges judgment judicial power judiciary jurisprudence jurists justice later lawyers legislative Letters liberal liberty Locke Mansﬁeld means moderate monarchy Montesquieu moral natural right notes opening opinion original particular philosophy political practice praise principles protect provides prudence question reason references reform regarding relation remarks republican republics requires Roman rule seeks separation of powers spirit suggests theme theory things thought tion Tocqueville Tocqueville’s tradition tranquillity understanding University