| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 806 pages
...injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit...then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee, for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers,... | |
| Illinois. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 724 pages
...injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative for the benefit...surviving widow or husband and children of such employee, resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents or employees of such... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 780 pages
...injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit...such employee; and, if none, then of such employee's 244 US Opinion of the Court. parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee,... | |
| South Carolina. Supreme Court, James Sanders Guignard Richardson (Reporter), Robert Wallace Shand (Reporter), Cyprian Melanchton Efird (Reporter), William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray (Reporter), William Munro Shand (Reporter) - Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 650 pages
...was "amended, by adding the following section : ''Sec. 9. Any right of action given by this act to a person suffering injury shall survive to his or...there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." No change was made in section 1 (US Comp. St., sec. 8657). It continues, as before, to provide for... | |
| Ohio. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1916 - 638 pages
...statute in question, so far as pertinent, reads as follows: "In case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit...of the next of kin dependent upon such employee." 35 US Stats, at Large, 65, C. 149; passed April 22, 1908. It is quite evident that much depends upon... | |
| Law - 1920 - 496 pages
...clear by the amendment of 1910, which provides as follows : t "Any right of action given by this act to a person suffering injury shall survive to his or...the surviving widow or husband and children of such employe, and, if none, then of such employe's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1909 - 2094 pages
...injury while he Is employed by such carrier in sueb commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit...children of such employee; and, if none, then of such em•For other cases BM same topic & 5 KTTMBEB in Dec. & Am. Dlg«. 1907 to date, ft Rep'r Indexe*... | |
| Arkansas. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1914 - 652 pages
...providing that "any right of action given ABK.] ST. Louis & SF ED. Co. v. CONARTY. 427 by this act to a person suffering injury shall survive to his or...there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." The statute as thus amended forbids the prosecution of more than one action and permits only one recovery;... | |
| Georgia Bar Association - Bar associations - 1912 - 346 pages
...his or her personal representative, for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband, or child or children of such employee, and if none, then of such...of the next of kin dependent upon such employee." The language of the Federal Act is the same except that the Federal Act is "for the benefit of the... | |
| Missouri. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 940 pages
...injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit...then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee, for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers,... | |
| |