The Northeastern Reporter, Volume 9West Publishing Company, 1887 - Law Includes the decisions of the Supreme Courts of Massachusetts, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and Court of Appeals of New York; May/July 1891-Mar./Apr. 1936, Appellate Court of Indiana; Dec. 1926/Feb. 1927-Mar./Apr. 1936, Courts of Appeals of Ohio. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 83
Page 66
... appellant question the validity of so much of the judgment of the court below as formally sets aside the tax deed ... appellant in its action of ejectment . After that decision was rendered , appellant had the right to pro- ceed ...
... appellant question the validity of so much of the judgment of the court below as formally sets aside the tax deed ... appellant in its action of ejectment . After that decision was rendered , appellant had the right to pro- ceed ...
Page 67
... appellant against William A. Howell and John E. Hall , who are shown by the evidence to have been ten- ants of the appellees . The case was tried before a jury , who returned a ver- dict of " not guilty , " and in September , 1881 ...
... appellant against William A. Howell and John E. Hall , who are shown by the evidence to have been ten- ants of the appellees . The case was tried before a jury , who returned a ver- dict of " not guilty , " and in September , 1881 ...
Page 68
... appellant , on the trial below , did not prove title in itself to the property in litigation . It is not denied that appellant has established its ownership of an undivided two - thirds of the lots . It appears , however , that under ...
... appellant , on the trial below , did not prove title in itself to the property in litigation . It is not denied that appellant has established its ownership of an undivided two - thirds of the lots . It appears , however , that under ...
Page 70
... appellant . Augustus N. Gage and Henry D. Beam , for appellee . SCHOLFIELD , J. It is contended on behalf of appellant that the court be- low erred ( 1 ) in decreeing that Asahel Gage was a purchaser , for value , of the lots in ...
... appellant . Augustus N. Gage and Henry D. Beam , for appellee . SCHOLFIELD , J. It is contended on behalf of appellant that the court be- low erred ( 1 ) in decreeing that Asahel Gage was a purchaser , for value , of the lots in ...
Page 75
... appellant has no possible ground or reason for complaining of either of the conclusions of law . The fundamental fact alleged by appellant , in stating her supposed cause of action against the appellee Harriet Piper , was that the ...
... appellant has no possible ground or reason for complaining of either of the conclusions of law . The fundamental fact alleged by appellant , in stating her supposed cause of action against the appellee Harriet Piper , was that the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affirmed agreement alleged Allen amount answer appellant appellant's appellee appellee's assessment assignment authority averment bill bond cause of action charge circuit court claim complaint contract conveyance conveyed counsel court of equity Court of Indiana creditors damages death debt deceased decree deed defendant defendant's demurrer entitled error estopped estoppel Evansville evidence executed executors facts filed heirs held injury instruction intended interest judgment jury land liable Mass ment mortgage N. E. Rep negligence notice November 23 overruled owner paid paragraph parties payment person plaintiff plaintiff in error possession proceedings promissory note purchase question quitclaim deed railroad real estate record recover replevin rule statute street sufficient suit superior court supra Supreme Court sustained taxes testator thereof tion town town of Oswegatchie trial trust verdict wife witness